International Reaction to Amnesty's last report over Ukraine:
Oksana Pokalchuk, Head of Amnesty International in Ukraine has announced, on the August the 06, 2022, her resignation from the organization over its much criticized report, which blame Ukraine for its combat tactics and said that Ukrainian military was putting the lives of civilians at risk.
After the publication of the report, the Ukrainian President has accused Amnesty International of “attempting to grant amnesty to the terrorist state of Russia”, by putting “the victim and the aggressor on an equal footing”.
The series of criticisms and resignations did not stop here, as Par Vestberg, the co-founder of Amnesty International’s Swedish branch, announced his resignation in protest over the « scandalous report », in a statement he made on Wednesday, August 10.
Amnesty International and other NGO vs International Media:
Amnesty International now finds itself the target of crossfire from Western press and media, the same ones that had raised this NGO on a pedestal when it came to attacking the targeted countries.
The biased approaches of Amnesty -as of Human Rights Watch - when dealing with human rights situations in certain countries are today masterfully unmasked.
For these NGOs everything is a question of interest and of the country to be targeted, according to the moods of the donors.
The methods of exploiting human rights in the most vile way possible, dictated by the godfather, Georges SOROS, are the same methods used in the past by Imperial forces who took advantage of the financial and military vulnerabilities of the states and the people they colonized.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch suspicious activities and objectives :
Multiple countries around the world has criticized these NGOs for their suspicious activities under the cover of protecting human rights. Some of these countries did even expose the insidious moves of these NGOs which are aimed at undermining feelings of patriotism among the citizens of objective countries vis-à-vis their institutions.
Nowadays, defending one's country against the pernicious inclinations of detractors has become deviance and heresy for these NGOs.
As anyone can see, the report made by these NGOs are generally short of arguments. So they exhaust themselves to serve a reheated dishes as part of an intellectual scam draped in a false moralism.
Testimony of the founder of Human Rights Watch :
Since this article deals with the subject of NGOs and By duty of memory, it is necessary to address the confession of Mr. Robert Bernstein, the founder of HRW, who died in 2019. In his testimony, which was published in a column on the New York Times, and which will remain engraved forever in the annals of history, Mr. Robert Bernstein castigated with unequivocal words, which also apply to Amnesty international, the leaders of HRW for having perverted the primary mission he had imagined for the organization he led for 20 years, calling it "morally corrupt".
Did Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch ever care about human rights ?
The answer to this question is the most easiest thing for any follower of the human rights issues around the world. Obviously, neither Amnesty nor HRW or even the west cares about human rights, as it is just a lever of pressure on the regimes which refuse to bow down when they aspire to consolidate their political, economic and cultural sovereignty and opt for a broader multilateralism.
It is really astonishing that no one is offended by these so-called NGOs who are becoming a source of disinformation for the entire international community by systematically and on a large scale spreading their false and biased information, to say the least, which are used to smear the targeted countries.
Hopefully, the indignation about Amnesty International’s last report by people who didn’t care about human rights all their life will be the beginning of a new era in which the people will say STOP to these so-called NGOs.
Comments